Part of the Maths & Statistics suite · 235 calculators

Normal Approximation to the Binomial Calculator

Approximate a binomial probability with a normal curve — with the continuity correction, the exact answer for comparison, and a check on whether the approximation is valid at all.

For large n the binomial is close to a normal with mean np and variance np(1−p).

%
Results update as you type
Results
P(X ≤ k), normal approximation
88.496879%
P(X ≤ k), exact binomial
Approximation error
Without the continuity correction
Mean np
Standard deviation
z used
Is the approximation valid?
Reviewed September 2026. Pure mathematics: the result does not depend on where you are. Terminology follows the national curriculum (maths, brackets, decimal point).
No account required · Google Analytics off unless allowedCalculator arithmetic runs in your browserResults update as you type
All calculations run 100% in your browser. The calculator code does not submit your figures to GlobalCalc to obtain a result.
About normal approximation to the binomial

How the normal approximation to the binomial calculator works

For large n the binomial is close to a normal with mean np and variance np(1−p). The continuity correction — extending the range by half an integer either side — is what makes a discrete count fit a continuous curve.

The usual validity rule is np ≥ 5 and n(1−p) ≥ 5. The calculator computes the exact binomial too, so you can see the error rather than trust the rule.

Formula: z = (k ± 0.5 − np) / √(np(1−p))

Worked examples

InputsP(X ≤ k), normal approximationNote
n = 100, p = 30%, k = 3588.496879%the approximation is accurate to about 0.03 points
At the mean54.344201%just above 50%
A rare event93.809387%np = 1 — the rule fails and the error shows

Frequently asked questions

When is the normal approximation valid?

The usual rule is np ≥ 5 and n(1−p) ≥ 5. Some texts demand 10. Either way, the approximation degrades as p moves toward 0 or 1.

What is the continuity correction?

Adding or subtracting 0.5 to the boundary, because a discrete count is being covered by a continuous curve. It typically cuts the error several-fold.

Why bother when the exact answer is computable?

Historically, because the exact sum was laborious. Today it matters mainly for understanding: it is why proportions have normal confidence intervals at all.

What if p is very small?

Use the Poisson approximation instead, with λ = np. It handles rare events far better than the normal.

Is this the central limit theorem?

A special case of it. A binomial count is a sum of independent Bernoulli trials, and the CLT says such sums tend to normal.

Where these figures come from

Last checked: September 2026. Formulas are fixed by mathematics and do not change with tax years or regulations.