Part of the Technology & IT suite · 35 calculators

Page Load Budget Calculator

Whether a page fits its load-time target — bytes over the connection, plus round trips, against the budget you set.

Load time is transfer time plus latency.

Results update as you type
Results
Estimated load time
2.4
Transfer time
Latency cost
Within budget?
Over or under budget by
Page weight that would fit the budget (KB)
What dominates
Effective round trips
Reviewed September 2026. Computing arithmetic: bytes, bits, seconds and probabilities do not change by country. Ofcom requires UK providers to quote a minimum guaranteed download speed.
No account required · Google Analytics off unless allowedCalculator arithmetic runs in your browserResults update as you type
All calculations run 100% in your browser. The calculator code does not submit your figures to GlobalCalc to obtain a result.
About page load budget

How the page load budget calculator works

Load time is transfer time plus latency. Transfer is bytes over bandwidth; latency is round trips times RTT, and on a slow connection the round trips often cost more than the bytes.

That is why reducing requests matters as much as reducing size. Ten requests at 150 ms RTT is 1.5 seconds before a single byte of the last one arrives, regardless of how small it is.

Formula: time = bytes / bandwidth + round trips × RTT

Worked examples

InputsEstimated load timeNote
1.8 MB over 45 requests2.4over a 3 s budget
Fewer requests1.68latency collapses
A lighter page1.36comfortably inside

Frequently asked questions

What page weight should I aim for?

Under 1 MB is a reasonable target and under 500 KB is good. The right number depends on the connection your users actually have.

Why do requests matter as much as bytes?

Because each round trip costs the full latency regardless of size. On a 150 ms connection, twenty serialised requests cost three seconds before any of them transfers.

What is a realistic connection to test on?

Slower than yours. A 4G connection at 10 Mbps and 120 ms RTT is a fair mid-range target; many users have worse.

Does HTTP/2 fix the request cost?

It multiplexes over one connection, which removes the connection setup but not the latency of the dependency chain. Fewer, larger requests still win.

Is this the same as a Core Web Vitals score?

No. This is a transfer estimate; Core Web Vitals measure rendering and interactivity, which depend on what the browser does with the bytes.

Where these figures come from

Last checked: September 2026. Units follow the SI decimal convention (IEC 80000-13 defines the binary alternatives); network and security figures cite the defining standard.