Part of the Maths & Statistics suite · 235 calculators

Sign Test Calculator

The simplest paired test there is — count how many pairs went up and how many went down, and ask whether the split is fair.

Discard the ties, count the positives and negatives, and test the count against a fair coin: under the null hypothesis of no shift, each pair is equally likely to go either way, so the count follows a binomial distribution with p = 0.

Results update as you type
Results
p-value (two-tailed, exact)
0.03088379
One-tailed p-value
Pairs used (ties dropped)
Observed proportion increasing
Decision at 5%
95% interval — lower
95% interval — upper
Ties discarded
Reviewed September 2026. Pure mathematics: the result does not depend on where you are. Terminology follows the Australian Curriculum (maths, brackets, decimal point).
No account required · Google Analytics off unless allowedCalculator arithmetic runs in your browserResults update as you type
All calculations run 100% in your browser. The calculator code does not submit your figures to GlobalCalc to obtain a result.
About sign test

How the sign test calculator works

Discard the ties, count the positives and negatives, and test the count against a fair coin: under the null hypothesis of no shift, each pair is equally likely to go either way, so the count follows a binomial distribution with p = 0.5.

It makes almost no assumptions — not even that the differences are on a meaningful scale — which makes it very robust and, correspondingly, not very powerful. Use it when you can only say which of a pair was larger.

Formula: P = binomial(k; n, 0.5), two-tailed

Worked examples

Inputsp-value (two-tailed, exact)Note
14 up, 4 down0.03088379p = 0.031
An even split1p = 1
All in one direction0.0078125p = 0.0078

Frequently asked questions

What does the sign test assume?

Almost nothing — only that the pairs are independent and that under the null each is equally likely to go either way.

Why discard the ties?

Because a tie is evidence for neither direction. Dropping them is the standard treatment, though it does reduce the effective sample.

How does it compare to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test?

Wilcoxon also uses the *size* of each difference, so it is more powerful — but it needs the differences to be on a real scale. The sign test only needs the direction.

When is it the right choice?

When all you can say is "this one is bigger" — taste tests, subjective preferences, ordinal ratings.

Why is it weak?

Because it throws away magnitude. A dozen tiny increases count the same as a dozen huge ones.

Where these figures come from

Last checked: September 2026. Formulas are fixed by mathematics and do not change with tax years or regulations.